Rules of Golf discussions and meanings •

Thank you to the contributors here and I would also welcome any descriptions of the style (as opposed to content) of questions that are in the different sections.  It is also very surprising that participants are not informed about the specific things they did not get right - surely it is in every participants (and the R&As) interest to ensure people learn from the process.

Given that an online process is being employed, I also think it is particularly disappointing if access to doing this exam (and the course material) is not opened up - what is the downside?  In the US, anyone can participate in their most demanding exam and are not treated like second-rate citizens and denied access. 

In my country, I can find no way to access this TARS-type material, it presents as a closed shop controlled by the State and National bodies in an utterly non-transparent way.  Access is unrelated to merit based on rules knowledge, learning commitment and individual capability.  This is frustrating in the extreme.

STATISTICS: Posted by Thom — 8 minutes ago

---