Beginning of the End for Religious Discrimination in Education?
/p
div class=paragraph paragraph--type--text paragraph--view-mode--default paragraph--227623 fs-sm
pIt’s rarely mentioned in media coverage of school choice, but choice programs do something huge: ameliorate government discrimination against religion. It’s anbsp;big reason to celebrate the explosion of universal choice programs./p
/div
,
div class=paragraph paragraph--type--text paragraph--view-mode--default paragraph--227624 fs-sm
pSix states — a href=https://www.wvlegislature.gov/Bill_Status/bills_history.cfm?year=2021amp;sessiontype=RSamp;input=2013West Virginia/a, a href=https://apps.azleg.gov/BillStatus/BillOverview/77976Arizona/a, a href=https://www.legis.iowa.gov/legislation/BillBook?ga=90amp;ba=HF+68Iowa/a, a href=https://le.utah.gov/~2023/bills/static/HB0215.htmlUtah/a, a href=https://www.arkleg.state.ar.us/Bills/Detail?id=sb294amp;ddBienniumSession=2023/2023RArkansas/a, and a href=https://www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2023/1Florida/a — have enacted universal choice since 2021, with the latter five having done so in the last year. “Universal” means programs that let funds follow students regardless of anbsp;family’s income or the condition of their assigned public school. In some programs universality phases in over anbsp;few years, and none provide the full amount that would have been spent on anbsp;child in anbsp;public school. But all put big dents in the financial penalty families suffer when they choose religious options./p
pWhy can’t public schools treat religious families equally?/p
pForemost, because public schools are government institutions, and constitutionally, government cannot advance religion. This is for anbsp;good reason: If government could push religion, it would have to select one — Methodist? Catholic? Buddhist? — rendering all others second‐class. And choosing emany/em religion discriminates against atheists./p
/div
,
aside class=aside--right aside--large paragraph paragraph--type--aside paragraph--view-mode--default paragraph--227626 aside
div class=paragraph paragraph--type--pullquote paragraph--view-mode--aside-nested paragraph--227625 pullquote p-mb-last-child-0
pIt’s rarely mentioned in media coverage of school choice, but choice programs do something huge: ameliorate government discrimination against religion./p
/div
/aside
,
div class=paragraph paragraph--type--text paragraph--view-mode--default paragraph--227627 fs-sm
pGiven the fundamental purpose of education — shaping human beings — how to handle religion has been, unsurprisingly, the longest‐standing dispute in public schooling, starting from the earliest days of “common schools” in the 1830s and ’40s. “Father of the common school” Horace Mann spent much time fending off charges that uniform government schooling would eject religion. Mann responded that he did not want that, and the key was a href=https://archive.org/stream/lifeandworkshor03manngoog/lifeandworkshor03manngoog_djvu.txtkeeping the Bible in/a the schools./p
pIt was no solution./p
pFirst, interpretations of the Bible are disputed even by people for whom the Bible is considered scripture./p
pIndeed, there is major disagreement about what should even be in the Bible. Jews typically accept only what Christians call the “Old Testament,” and Protestants and Catholics usually disagree on the “apocryphal” or “deuterocanonical” books. Of course, numerous religions do not accept the Bible at all./p
pTo get sufficient support to create and maintain public schools, public schooling for most of its history embraced lowest‐common‐denominator Protestantism, with Protestant prayers, hymns, and readings from the King James Bible. But not only was that troubling for a href=https://www.amazon.com/Common-School-Charles-Leslie-Glenn/dp/1558155228some Protestants/a — especially those committed to denominational dogmas — it was highly problematic for Catholics, who were becoming an increasingly large group about the time of Mann’s crusade./p
pCatholics could not accept the King James Bible, nor interpretations of scripture other than from the Catholic Church. Many also objected to singing Protestant hymns, and public‐school lessons were sometimes overtly anti‐Catholic. This led to intense battles in places such as a href=https://www.amazon.com/Complete-works-most-Rev-Hughes/dp/5518598734New York City/a and a href=https://philadelphiaencyclopedia.org/essays/nativist-riots-of-1844/Philadelphia/a./p
pThe basic incompatibility of Protestant public schooling and Catholicism is anbsp;major reason Catholics had to establish their own schools, which at their a href=https://www.educationnext.org/can-catholic-schools-be-saved/#:~:text=The%20Catholic%20%E2%80%9Csystem%E2%80%9D%20continued%20to,n%20roll%E2%80%94and%20Vatican%20II.peak in 1965/a educated roughly 12 percent of all school‐aged kids. This after paying taxes for public schools./p
pBut Catholics weren’t the only ones unhappy with religion in public schools. In 1963, in response to cases brought by atheist and Unitarian families, the a href=https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/370/421/#tab-opinion-1943887U.S. Supreme Court declared/a official public‐school prayer and devotional Bible reading unconstitutional./p
pThat was good for atheists and others who preferred education divorced from religion, but it rendered many religious families second‐class. This spurred anbsp;campaign to return prayer to the public schools, which partially played out in last year’s Supreme Court ruling that anbsp;public‐school football coach a href=https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/21-418_i425.pdfmust be allowed to pray/a at games./p
pClosely connected to prayer battles have been a href=https://www.cato.org/public-schooling-battle-mapclashes nationwide/a over books such as the graphic novel “Gender Queer” in public school libraries, and bathroom access based on one’s gender identity. While often not overtly religious, these battles encompass religious values./p
pUnfortunately, when religion comes up in the choice debate it is typically to assert that a href=https://ffrf.org/faq/state-church/item/22744-voucherfaqchoice violates/a the “separation of church and state,” or a href=https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-politics-and-policy/supreme-courts-religious-school-ruling-signals-dangerous-road-lgbtq-ri-rcna34849unacceptably lets people choose/a schools embracing beliefs that liberals, especially, dislike./p
pThe former is just wrong: Rather than government establishing religion, choice keeps government emneutral/em. On the latter point, liberals should openly condemn teachings they find abhorrent. But government favoring their values over others is anbsp;fundamental violation of equality under the law./p
pGovernment schools cannot be simultaneously secular and religious, Methodist and Buddhist, Jewish and Catholic. For this reason alone, everyone should celebrate the great expansion of school choice./p
/div