Nearly aThird of Gen ZFavors the Government Installing Surveillance Cameras in Homes

pa href=https://www.cato.org/people/emily-ekins hreflang=undEmily Ekins/a and Jordan Gygi
/p

p

/pdiv data-embed-button=image data-entity-embed-display=view_mode:media.blog_post data-entity-embed-display-settings={quot;link_urlquot;:quot;https:\/\/www.amazon.com\/1984-Essential-Orwell-Classics\/dp\/6257120896\/ref=asc_df_6257120896\/?tag=hyprod-20\u0026linkCode=df0\u0026hvadid=507909480224\u0026hvpos=\u0026hvnetw=g\u0026hvrand=15132996712526787265\u0026hvpone=\u0026hvptwo=\u0026hvqmt=\u0026hvdev=c\u0026hvdvcmdl=\u0026hvlocint=\u0026hvlocphy=9008155\u0026hvtargid=pla-1202049062801\u0026psc=1quot;,quot;link_url_targetquot;:1} data-entity-type=media data-entity-uuid=b14007e2-981b-4025-b6d0-00c9626ed8de data-langcode=en class=align-right embedded-entitya href=https://www.amazon.com/1984-Essential-Orwell-Classics/dp/6257120896/ref=asc_df_6257120896/?tag=hyprod-20amp;amp%3BlinkCode=df0amp;amp%3Bhvadid=507909480224amp;amp%3Bhvpos=amp;amp%3Bhvnetw=gamp;amp%3Bhvrand=15132996712526787265amp;amp%3Bhvpone=amp;amp%3Bhvptwo=amp;amp%3Bhvqmt=amp;amp%3Bhvdev=camp;amp%3Bhvdvcmdl=amp;amp%3Bhvlocint=amp;amp%3Bhvlocphy=9008155amp;amp%3Bhvtargid=pla-1202049062801amp;amp%3Bpsc=1 target=_blank



img loading=lazy src=/sites/cato.org/files/styles/pubs_2x/public/2023-05/1984book.jpeg?itok=rrD0Ptiw width=434 height=668 alt=1984 class=image-style-pubs-2x component-image //a/div
pspanspanGeorge Orwell’s /spanem1984 /em/spanspanspanis one of our society’s most frequently referenced illustrations of what life would be like under an authoritarian government. Actual government policies that are viewed as illiberal in varying degrees are often /span/spana href=https://www.npr.org/2022/11/18/1137836712/college-university-florida-woke-desantis-1984spanspanspanspantied to this novel/span/span/span/span/aspanspan by opponents, an easy and effective way to call out government overreach and control. In the /span/spana href=https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=vamp;pid=sitesamp;srcid=ZGVmYXVsdGRvbWFpbnxiaHNzbGF0ZXJzZW5nbGlzaHxneDoyNjliZjQ5ZTkzMDBmM2U3spanspanspanspanbook em1984/em/span/span/span/span/aspanspan, citizens of the fictional nation Oceania are under constant government surveillance, including in their own homes. Devices called telescreens display propaganda and record peoples’ actions, allowing the government to monitor people even in what should be the most private place they know/span/span—spanspantheir homes. This type of behavior is meant to be an extreme example of what can happen when a government gains too much power, and opposition to such surveillance has been assumed to be overwhelming and obvious. But is it? /span/span/p
pspanspanIn a newly released /span/spana href=https://www.cato.org/survey-reports/poll-only-16-americans-support-government-issuing-central-bank-digital-currency?au_hash=6aZ8djbslxSndG0DjZMmbUYgCJLRxYSdCn2wZibWmzA#cbdcs-are-about-popular-home-government-surveillance-camerasspanspanspanspanCato Institute 2023 Central Bank Digital Currency National Survey/span/span/span/span/aspanspan of 2,000 Americans, we asked respondents whether they “favor or oppose the government installing surveillance cameras in every household to reduce domestic violence, abuse, and other illegal activity.” Not surprisingly, few Americans/span/span—spanspanonly 14 percent/span/span—spanspansupport this idea. Three‐​fourths (75 percent) would oppose government surveillance cameras in homes, including 68 percent who “strongly oppose,” while 10% don’t have an opinion either way./span/span/p
p

/pdiv data-embed-button=embed data-entity-embed-display=view_mode:media.blog_post data-entity-type=media data-entity-uuid=f115c46b-1a0f-4a27-a4cc-89a18bb9da41 data-langcode=en class=align-center embedded-entity data-entity-embed-display-settings=[]


div class=embed embed--infogram js-embed js-embed--infogram
div class=responsive-embed/div
/div

/div
pspanspanHowever, Americans under the age of 30 stand out when it comes to 1984‐​style in‐​home government surveillance cameras. 3 in 10 (29 percent) Americans under 30 favor “the government installing surveillance cameras in every household” in order to “reduce domestic violence, abuse, and other illegal activity.” Support declines with age, dropping to 20 percent among 30/span/span–spanspan44 year olds and dropping considerably to 6 percent among those over the age of 45. /span/span/p
p

/pdiv data-embed-button=embed data-entity-embed-display=view_mode:media.blog_post data-entity-type=media data-entity-uuid=227edfc3-cae8-4867-8679-3665261a1a3f data-langcode=en class=align-center embedded-entity data-entity-embed-display-settings=[]


div class=embed embed--infogram js-embed js-embed--infogram
div class=responsive-embed/div
/div

/div
pspanspanWe don’t know how much of this preference for security over privacy or freedom is something unique to this generation (a cohort effect) or simply the result of youth (age effect). However, there is reason to think part of this is generational. Americans over age 45 have vastly different attitudes on in‐​home surveillance cameras than those who are younger. These Americans were born in or before 1978. Thus the very youngest were at least 11 before the Berlin Wall fell. Being raised during the Cold War amidst regular news reports of the Soviet Union surveilling their own people may have demonstrated to Americans the dangers of giving the government too much power to monitor people. Young people today are less exposed to these types of examples and thus less aware of the dangers of expansive government power./span/span/p
pspanspanIt is also possible that increased support for government surveillance among the young has common roots with what Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt /span/spana href=https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2015/09/the-coddling-of-the-american-mind/399356/spanspanspanspandescribe/span/span/span/span/aspanspan in the /span/spanspanemCoddling of the American Mind/em/spanspanspan: young people seem more willing to prioritize safety (from possible violence or hurtful words) over ensuring robust freedom (from government surveillance or to speak freely)./span/span/p
p

/pdiv data-embed-button=embed data-entity-embed-display=view_mode:media.blog_post data-entity-type=media data-entity-uuid=737b3e77-76ff-47cb-a1e3-56dfc7b960b2 data-langcode=en class=align-center embedded-entity data-entity-embed-display-settings=[]


div class=embed embed--infogram js-embed js-embed--infogram
div class=responsive-embed/div
/div

/div
pspanspanOther demographics also differ in their tolerance of government surveillance in their homes. African Americans (33 percent) and Hispanic Americans (25 percent) are more likely than White Americans (9 percent) and Asian Americans (11 percent) to support in‐​home government surveillance. Democrats (17 percent) are also more likely than Republicans (11 percent) to support it but not by a wide margin. This issue divides Democrats between those who identify as “very liberal” in which only 9 percent support and “liberal” who are more than twice as likely to support (19 percent). Notably the issue doesn’t divide men (15 percent) and women (13 percent) who were about equally likely to support./span/span/p
pWe asked this question as part of our a href=https://www.cato.org/survey-reports/poll-only-16-americans-support-government-issuing-central-bank-digital-currencysurvey/a on Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) in order to see whether there is a relationship between opinions on the government issuing a central bank digital currency and government installing cameras in homes. It appears that the two opinions are correlated. Interestingly, more than half (53 percent) of those who support the United States adopting a CBDC are also supportive of government surveillance cameras in homes, while only 2 percent of those who oppose a CBDC feel the same. This suggests there may be a common consideration that is prompted by both issues. Likely, it has to do with willingness to give up privacy in hopes of greater security./p
p

/pdiv data-embed-button=embed data-entity-embed-display=view_mode:media.blog_post data-entity-type=media data-entity-uuid=560e3e08-ac04-4312-8359-a803b75630b5 data-langcode=en class=align-center embedded-entity data-entity-embed-display-settings=[]


div class=embed embed--infogram js-embed js-embed--infogram
div class=responsive-embed/div
/div

/div
pspanspanIt is important to emphasize that the overwhelming majority of Americans across demographic groups oppose the government surveilling people in their homes. Nevertheless, it is relevant to note the higher acceptance among younger generations to trade freedom and privacy for some added security and protection. /span/span/p
pspanspanIf these trends continue, the United States may confront a very different privacy landscape in the future. It is possible that at some point, the American public will be open to extreme government overreach in a world that feels scarier and more dangerous than before, whether or not it is. Thus, it is important to impart the learnings of the past (and present) about what can happen when government amasses too much power. Without explicitly telling younger generations about the risks and dangers of government surveillance they will forget these lessons and may find themselves repeating devastating mistakes of the past. /span/span/p