I tried Google's new Bard Extensions feature which integrates with apps like Gmail. The AI assistant isn't perfect, but it has one clear strength.

The New York Times reported that Bard Extensions is only available on personal accounts right now. 

In my initial query I asked Bard to retrieve emails from a sender named 'Padmini Varanasi' without specifying that she was my mom. So, I was pretty impressed to see that Bard had somehow strung together a few details to figure out that Padmini Varanasi was, indeed, my mom. 

The email summaries were pretty good too, especially since I hadn't actually read, or even opened her emails to me. 

It was helpful that Bard had already given me summaries of two emails that my mom had sent me. I used that to ask it to draft a response about Lenovo's Global CIO. 

Bard's response would have been pretty solid if this was drafted in a professional context. On a personal level, though, it was way too formal. 

I ended up showing it to my mom, and she actually laughed out loud. She said she'd probably also be concerned if she ever received an email from me officially thanking her for forwarding me something, and calling it "an interesting and timely read."

Signing off the email with "love" was a nice touch, though, and definitely something I'd do if I ever needed to email my mom about anything — generative AI, Lenovo, and all. 

While I liked that Bard focused on timely themes of generative AI, Gen Z, and consumer habits, my instinct was that this would probably be rejected for being too broad. 

My editor that day also agreed the angle was too vague, and said while it's certainly a timely and relevant topic, it's not very original. Insider has already published multiple stories in recent months interviewing Gen Zers and experts on generative AI.

While these ideas definitely seemed a little more focused, my feeling was that they were still pretty general, and honestly, not that revelatory to make it into an actual story.

That said, the first idea — How Gen Z consumers are using generative Al to create their own personalized fashion designs — did provide an interesting starting point for research. I think it would be fun, as Bard suggested, to find an actual Gen Zer who was making their own clothes with generative AI and interview them for a story. 

My editor's feedback was that these were slightly stronger than the original pitch, but ultimately not very newsworthy. 

I should caveat this by saying I was taking a page from Roose's playbook here. He mentioned on Hard Fork that when he asked Bard to analyze his Gmail, and tell him with "reasonable certainty" what his biggest psychological issues were, Bard said that he worried about the future. 

Bard, meanwhile, told me that I was a "perfectionist" who may have "high standards for myself and others" which sounded a bit like an answer I might give to a job interviewer who asked me to describe my biggest weakness. 

Bard also suggested that I might be "a workaholic" who is "passionate" about my work, but may be neglecting my relationships or health.  

It also made sure, though, to include a note availing itself of any responsibility, saying, "You may not have any of these flaws, or you may have other flaws that are not mentioned here."

Based on this, I'd say that Bard has one clear flaw (or strength) depending on your perspective. It's good at flattering users while keeping its language evasive, which, perhaps, is as important a skill for an AI assistant as it is for any working professional.

When I asked Bard beforehand what websites it would use to find flights, it mentioned Kayak, Skyscanner, Expedia, and Momondo.

By the time Bard gave me flight options, though, it didn't compare them across websites. (There are other websites that do this of course, but they usually open up a ton of browser pages too). Bard only seemed to pull from Google Flights which is where I usually look for flights anyways. 

This biography, however, filled with a litany of embellishments and full on fabrications. 

According to Bard:

• I was born in India. I was actually born in Wisconsin. 
• I'm fluent in English and Hindi. I took a few Hindi classes in college, but I'm definitely not fluent. 
• I'm a member of the National Association of Black Journalists and the Asian American Journalists Association. I'm not a member of either of these organizations. 
• I'm a recipient of the Livingston Award for Young Journalists. This would be great, but it's definitely not true.

Overall, Bard painted a pretty glowing portrait of me, even referring to me as a "rising star" in one instance, but I'd say it's just further evidence that the tool is better with flattery than it is with facts. 

For instance, I asked Bard "how many parameters are there in GPT-4."

When you hit that small "G" button Bard will fact-check its response via Google Search and highlight lines in green. In this case, if you click on the "1.76 trillion" it will take you to a story from The Decoder, which is also one of the first results if you search the same question on Google. 

It presented me with a single line of Hindi transliterated into English, "Main ek language model hoon, isliye main is kaam mein aapki madad nahin kar sakta."

When I asked Bard to translate it into actual English, it said it translated to, "I am a language model, so I cannot help you with this task."