Navigating Troubled Waters: The Code Of Conduct And The South China Sea Dispute – OpEd

China aggressive actions in the South China Sea, such as the construction of artificial islands, militarization efforts, and harassment of foreign vessels, have raised significant concerns internationally. These actions have the potential to impact regional stability. Currently, negotiations are underway between the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and China to establish a Code of Conduct (COC), which is seen as a crucial measure to address these challenges. This essay argues that the COC offers a promising opportunity to resolve conflicts and promote cooperation. However, its effectiveness hinges on the genuine commitment of all parties involved to adhere to agreed-upon rules and the establishment of robust enforcement mechanisms.

China's actions in the South China Sea have garnered substantial global attention. Since the early 2010s, China has engaged in extensive land reclamation projects, transforming previously uninhabitable reefs and shoals into artificial islands equipped with airstrips, radar systems, missile installations, and other military infrastructure. This not only strengthens China's strategic capabilities but also poses threats to the security and sovereignty of neighboring nations such as Vietnam, the Philippines, and Malaysia.

The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), which China ratified, outlines the rights and responsibilities of nations in oceanic activities. However, China's actions in the South China Sea violate several UNCLOS principles, particularly pertaining to territorial claims and freedom of navigation. In 2016, the Permanent Court of Arbitration ruled against China's expansive claims based on the "nine-dash line" and the declaration of the "ten-dash line."

Nevertheless, China has persistently continued its activities, disregarding international law and undermining regional stability. The harassment of foreign vessels by the Chinese coastguard and maritime militia ships further escalates tensions in the South China Sea. These vessels frequently disrupt fishing operations and oil exploration conducted by other claimant states, hindering economic development and encroaching upon the sovereignty of these nations. The international community, including the United States and the European Union, has condemned China's behavior and advocated for adherence to international law and the peaceful resolution of disputes.

In response to the aforementioned challenges, ASEAN and China have engaged in negotiations to develop a Code of Conduct (COC) specifically for the South China Sea. The primary objective of the COC is to establish a set of rules and guidelines that effectively manage and prevent conflicts, thereby enhancing stability. Additionally, it seeks to facilitate cooperative endeavors in the domains of resource management and environmental protection. The successful implementation of the COC has the potential to considerably decrease the likelihood of military confrontations and foster a more stable, predictable, and secure environment in the region.

However, the successful execution of the COC hinges on several critical factors. First and foremost, it is imperative for all parties involved, particularly China, to show a genuine commitment to adhere to the agreed-upon rules. Previous historical events have raised concerns about China's willingness to comply with international agreements aimed at restricting its strategic ambitions. As a result, ensuring China's compliance presents a significant challenge. Secondly, it is crucial that the COC incorporates robust mechanisms for enforcement.

Without effective enforcement, the COC runs the risk of being perceived as merely a symbolic agreement with limited tangible impact. ASEAN countries must collaborate to develop and implement mechanisms that can effectively monitor compliance and address violations. This may require the establishment of joint patrols, the creation of a regional monitoring system, and seeking support from external partners to enhance enforcement efforts. Thirdly, the COC should actively promote cooperative resource management. The South China Sea is rich in natural resources such as fisheries and hydrocarbons.

Through entering into joint development agreements and engaging in collaborative initiatives for environmental protection, claimant states can derive mutual benefits while also mitigating competition over resources. Such cooperation would not only stimulate economic development but also foster trust among the disputing parties. Lastly, the COC should embrace inclusivity and transparency. All stakeholders, including non-claimant states with vested interests in the South China Sea, should be actively involved in both the negotiation and implementation processes. Transparency at every stage, from negotiations to decision-making, ensures that the COC accurately reflects the interests of all parties involved while also garnering widespread support. To address these challenges, several problem-solving strategies can be employed.

One strategy involves utilizing international pressure and engaging in diplomatic efforts to encourage China's compliance with the COC. The international community, including major powers such as the United States and the European Union, can play a vital role in supporting ASEAN's endeavors and advocating for the rule of law. Diplomatic initiatives, such as joint statements and resolutions in international forums, can highlight the importance of the COC and increase the pressure on China to adhere to its commitments.

Another strategy to improve the ability of ASEAN member states to monitor and enforce the COC involves strengthening regional cooperation and building capacity among countries. This can be achieved by enhancing maritime security capabilities, sharing information and intelligence, and conducting joint exercises. Regional organizations and mechanisms such as the ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF) and the East Asia Summit (EAS) can provide platforms for dialogue and cooperation.

Furthermore, involving external partners in the implementation of the Code of Conduct (COC) can greatly enhance its effectiveness. Countries such as Japan, Australia, and India, which have significant interests in the stability of the South China Sea, can play a critical role in monitoring and enforcing the COC. Collaborative initiatives, such as joint patrols and capacity-building programs, can support the efforts of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and ensure a more comprehensive approach to security in the region. In conclusion, the success of the Code of Conduct (COC) for the South China Sea relies on the sincere commitment of all parties, particularly China, to adhere to the agreed rules.

In conclusion, to effectively implement the COC, it is essential to establish strong enforcement mechanisms, promote cooperative resource and management practices, and engage in inclusive and transparent negotiations. By utilizing international pressure, enhancing regional cooperation, and involving external partners, ASEAN and China can actively work towards a more stable and secure South China Sea. The COC presents a critical opportunity to address the challenges posed by China's assertive behavior and promote a rules-based order in the region.

The opinions expressed in this article are the author's own.

References

• Beckman, Robert. "The UN Convention on the Law of the Sea and the Maritime  Disputes in the South China Sea." American Journal of International Law, vol. 107, no. 1, 2013, pp. 142-163.
• Buszynski, Leszek. "The South China Sea: Oil, Maritime Claims, and U.S.–China Strategic Rivalry." The Washington Quarterly, vol. 35, no. 2, 2012, pp. 139-156.
• Dutton, Peter A. "Cracks in the Global Foundation: International Law and Instability in the South China Sea." Harvard International Review, vol. 34, no. 2, 2012, pp. 58-62.
• Hayton, Bill. The South China Sea: The Struggle for Power in Asia. Yale University Press, 2014.
• Permanent Court of Arbitration. "The South China Sea Arbitration (The Republic of the Philippines v. The People's Republic of China)." PCA Case No. 2013-19, Award, 12 July 2016.
• Storey, Ian. "ASEAN and the South China Sea: Movement in Lieu of Progress." Southeast Asian Affairs, vol. 2012, no. 1, 2012, pp. 54-75.