Conflict at the Core: Examining Hamas and Israel’s Vast Ideological Differences

To understand the ideological differences between Hamas and Israel, we need to delve into their historic mindsets and their fundamental...

The post Conflict at the Core: Examining Hamas and Israel’s Vast Ideological Differences first appeared on Algemeiner.com.

November 2023: An Israeli soldier helps to provide incubators to Al Shifa Hospital in Gaza. Photo: Screenshot

To understand the ideological differences between Hamas and Israel, we need to delve into their historic mindsets and their fundamental principles.

The Right Honourable Ernest Bevin, British Foreign Secretary during the period leading up to the United Nations Partition Plan for the land that eventually became Israel, captured these differences succinctly in a speech to the House of Commons on October 31, 1947. Bevin noted: “The Arabs and Jews have different principles, and they want different things. I do not see how they can both be satisfied with a single state.”

Bevin perceived that the Jewish community in Palestine sought to establish a Jewish state, with a focus on self-determination, sovereignty, and the creation of a homeland for the Jewish people. Simply put, the Jews wanted a State — of any size — in their ancestral homeland. And as we soon saw, the Jewish population was willing to live side by side with their Arab neighbors.

Conversely, Bevin understood that the Arab population in Palestine wished to maintain Arab control and dominance over all the territory, rejecting in every aspect, the establishment of a Jewish state. Simply put, the Arab population at the time wanted to prevent the Jews from having their own state, even one as “small as a postage stamp” — a familiar saying among Arab leaders at the time.

Unfortunately today, much of that dynamic remains unchanged. Israel has offered — and worked — to help create a Palestinian state numerous times — only to be met with constant rejection and terrorism in response. One side has been productive, and far too many leaders on the Palestinian side have been destructive. Israel, for example, completely withdrew from Gaza in 2005, leaving greenhouses, a vibrant beachfront, and other elements that were ready to pave the way for a Palestinian state. Israel had a desire to share and to build. Hamas, unfortunately, only had a desire to deny and destroy.

This dichotomy is evident in the personal story of Gadi, an Israeli peacenik, and his Palestinian pen pal, Ahmad. For years, Gadi engaged in hopeful exchanges with Ahmad, envisioning a world where petty differences could be transcended. However, the events of October 7, 2023, shattered this illusion. Gadi’s plea for sympathy was met with cold justification from Ahmad, who bluntly stated that “From The River To The Sea” meant the end of the State of Israel. The brutal reality of October 7 underscores the ideological chasm between many on the two sides. Hamas’ actions, which are supported by a majority of Gazan civilians, reveal a steadfast commitment to that eliminationist goal. While the Jews have built a thriving, productive, sovereign state, Hamas has constructed an underground fortress dedicated to violence and destruction.

While it is tempting to label Hamas as “evil,” it is far more imperative to understand the sophistication of their tactics and strategic thinking. Hamas’ actions on October 7 were meticulously planned to puncture Israel’s defenses, incite global sympathy for Palestinians, and isolate Israel from the world community. In this regard — hopefully, for the short term — they have done remarkably well. Calls for Israel to explain its legitimacy are absurd, and betray a thinly veiled animus toward the Jewish people as a whole. Israel’s right to exist derives not from UN resolutions (though it has those also), but on its historical, cultural, and sovereign ties to the land, documented for centuries.

My concern over these last nine months has to do with the protection of seven million of my brothers and sisters living in Israel. It would not be different if a pogrom had been launched against them in Warsaw, Montreal, Minneapolis, or Paris. It is time, right now, to free all of the kidnapped victims from the warrens of Gaza and bring them home. It is time to utterly destroy Hamas and their ilk. It is time to stand against the Iranian regime, and urge a different future for that country. It is time to create a real peace, a true peace. May it be so. Speedily in our days.

Peter Himmelman, a Grammy and Emmy nominated rock and roll performer, songwriter, and film composer, is releasing his new book, Suspended by No String (Regalo Press, distributed by Simon & Schuster) on August 13. It’s available for pre-order now on Amazon.

The post Conflict at the Core: Examining Hamas and Israel’s Vast Ideological Differences first appeared on Algemeiner.com.