Olympics Committee Defends its Decision to Allow Two Boxers with Male DNA to Compete at Women’s Boxing: “Every Person Has the Right to Practice Sport Without Discrimination”
The Olympics is marred with controversy after allowing two boxers —Taiwanese Lin Yu-Ting and Italian Angela Carini— who have been disqualified by the International Boxing Association (IBA) for failing gender eligibility tests, to compete in the women’s category at the Paris 2024 Olympics.
The post Olympics Committee Defends its Decision to Allow Two Boxers with Male DNA to Compete at Women’s Boxing: “Every Person Has the Right to Practice Sport Without Discrimination” appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.
The Olympics is marred with controversy after allowing two boxers —Taiwanese Lin Yu-Ting and Italian Angela Carini— who have been disqualified by the International Boxing Association (IBA) for failing gender eligibility tests, to compete in the women’s category at the Paris 2024 Olympics.
During the Olympic boxing qualifiers, Lin Yu-Ting decisively defeated Uzbekistan’s Sitora Turdibekova with a 3-0 scoreline, while Angela Carini ended her bout against Algeria’s Imane Khelif in just 46 seconds.
Both victories have drawn intense scrutiny given that both athletes were previously disqualified from the IBA Women’s World Boxing Championships in New Delhi due to their failure to meet eligibility criteria.
The IBA has made it clear that these athletes possess competitive advantages over their female counterparts, a claim supported by rigorous testing protocols.
“This disqualification was a result of their failure to meet the eligibility criteria for participating in the women’s competition, as set and laid out in the IBA Regulations. This decision, made after a meticulous review, was extremely important and necessary to uphold the level of fairness and utmost integrity of the competition,” the IBA said in its press release.
The IBA added, “Our Committees have rigorously reviewed and endorsed the decision made during the World Championships. While IBA remains committed to ensuring competitive fairness in all of our events, we express concern over the inconsistent application of eligibility criteria by other sporting organizations, including those overseeing the Olympic Games. The IOC’s differing regulations on these matters, in which IBA is not involved, raise serious questions about both competitive fairness and athletes’ safety.”
Read more:
In response to mounting criticism, the IOC issued a statement defending its position. "Every person has the right to practice sport without discrimination," they declared.
The IOC insisted that all athletes participating in the boxing tournament comply with eligibility regulations based on their passports and that these rules had been consistently applied during qualification events across various international competitions.
However, this defense has done little to quell outrage among advocates for women's sports who argue that allowing individuals who do not meet gender eligibility requirements undermines female athletes' rights and opportunities.
Read the full statement below:
Every person has the right to practise sport without discrimination.
All athletes participating in the boxing tournament of the Olympic Games Paris 2024 comply with the competition’s eligibility and entry regulations, as well as all applicable medical regulations set by the Paris 2024 Boxing Unit (PBU) (please find all applicable rules here). As with previous Olympic boxing competitions, the gender and age of the athletes are based on their passport.
These rules also applied during the qualification period, including the boxing tournaments of the 2023 European Games, Asian Games, Pan American Games and Pacific Games, the ad hoc 2023 African qualifying tournament in Dakar (SEN) and two world qualifying tournaments held in Busto Arsizio (ITA) and Bangkok (THA) in 2024, which involved a total of 1,471 different boxers from 172 National Olympic Committees (NOCs), the Boxing Refugee Team and Individual Neutral Athletes, and featured over 2,000 qualification bouts.
The PBU used the Tokyo 2020 boxing rules as a baseline to develop its regulations for Paris 2024. This was to minimise the impact on athletes’ preparations and guarantee consistency between Olympic Games. These Tokyo 2020 rules were based on the post-Rio 2016 rules, which were in place before the suspension of the boxing International Federation by the IOC in 2019 and the subsequent withdrawal of its recognition in 2023.
We have seen in reports misleading information about two female athletes competing at the Olympic Games Paris 2024. The two athletes have been competing in international boxing competitions for many years in the women’s category, including the Olympic Games Tokyo 2020, International Boxing Association (IBA) World Championships and IBA-sanctioned tournaments.
These two athletes were the victims of a sudden and arbitrary decision by the IBA. Towards the end of the IBA World Championships in 2023, they were suddenly disqualified without any due process.
According to the IBA minutes available on their website, this decision was initially taken solely by the IBA Secretary General and CEO. The IBA Board only ratified it afterwards and only subsequently requested that a procedure to follow in similar cases in the future be established and reflected in the IBA Regulations. The minutes also say that the IBA should “establish a clear procedure on gender testing”.
The current aggression against these two athletes is based entirely on this arbitrary decision, which was taken without any proper procedure – especially considering that these athletes had been competing in top-level competition for many years.
Such an approach is contrary to good governance.
Eligibility rules should not be changed during ongoing competition, and any rule change must follow appropriate processes and should be based on scientific evidence.
The IOC is committed to protecting the human rights of all athletes participating in the Olympic Games as per the Olympic Charter, the IOC Code of Ethics and the IOC Strategic Framework on Human Rights. The IOC is saddened by the abuse that the two athletes are currently receiving.
The IBA’s recognition was withdrawn by the IOC in 2023 following its suspension in 2019. The withdrawal of recognition was confirmed by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS). See the IOC’s statement following the ruling.
The IOC has made it clear that it needs National Boxing Federations to reach a consensus around a new International Federation in order for boxing to be included on the sports programme of the Olympic Games LA28.
The post Olympics Committee Defends its Decision to Allow Two Boxers with Male DNA to Compete at Women’s Boxing: “Every Person Has the Right to Practice Sport Without Discrimination” appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.