Here’s How Colleges Should Respond to Destructive BDS Resolutions on Campus

On November 7, 2024, the Duke Divestment Committee (DDC), a close ally of Duke Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP), petitioned the Duke Advisory Committee on Investment Responsibility (ACIR) to call for Duke to “Divest direct and indirect holdings in all companies and entities that support or profit from Israeli apartheid…” 

This proposal was based on false antisemitic propaganda, and it promoted dangerous blood libels against the Jewish people. The baseless accusations of apartheid and genocide are more than just words — they have led to global violence against Jews, which has also spread to US college campuses. 

On December 10, 2024, the Duke ACIR rejected the DDC’s proposal. Faced with the option to cave into the antisemitic Boycott, Divestment, and Sanction (BDS) movement, the Duke University leadership decided to stand up for truth and justice, and abide by the university’s mission statement to foster a “community of students who embrace growth, collaboration, creativity and integrity.” 

While the decision of ACIR and Duke’s president seem to be a victory for truth over propaganda, the student initiative still spread vicious lies about Israel — lies that will likely be believed by many students who haven’t done their own research on the topic. And these anti-Zionist antisemitic groups will likely spin their defeat into more hateful rhetoric against Israel, the Jewish people, and Duke University.

This decision should be levered by Duke into a different BDS initiative — Build, Develop, and Share. This BDS initiative would stand in contrast to the destructive and antisemitic Boycott, Divestment, and Sanction movement, and flip the narrative on anti-Israel and pro-Hamas propagandists.

Israel is known as “The Start-up Nation” — with around one start-up for every 1,400 people. It would be a catastrophe if the BDS movement was successful in driving capital away from Israel. It is not possible to strangle the Israeli economy and support the Arab Israeli community at the same time. Growth and innovation are contagious. The BDS movement is not pro-Palestinian or pro-Arab. It is anti-Israel. SJP and similar groups’ hatred for Jews blinds them to the harm they cause to Arab Israelis and Palestinians. 

As students graduating from universities  in the United States seek interesting and challenging careers in Silicon Valley and elsewhere, there is a vibrant startup ecosystem raging across the Middle East. Founders and venture capitalists are investing in a vital, diverse and inclusive “Silicon Wadi.”

One example of a company that is focused on growing start-ups founded by Arab Israelis is Nazareth-based NGT Healthcare. NGT is an “early-stage medical device and life sciences venture capital fund.” Consistent with its mission, NGT has funded companies in Israel started by Arab entrepreneurs (35%), employ Israeli Arabs (29%), that are supported by  Arab investors (25%), and are managed by Arabs (25%). This is a very odd version of “apartheid.”

Since the historic Abraham Accords were signed, the UAE has invested more than $10 billion, alongside Israel, to bolster the economic cooperation between the two countries. These funds were invested across many sectors, including energy, manufacturing, water, space, healthcare, and agri-tech. 

At the same time, oceans away, on “elite” US college campuses, millions of dollars have been wasted on repairing damage caused by SJP and anti-Israel activists. Time, money and energy are scarce resources that are currently being wasted on students who seek destruction over dialogue.

Anyone who cares about a future generation of Jews and Arabs prospering together, should be looking towards the Silicon Wadi as a beacon of hope. Universities who care about the growth, collaboration, creativity, and integrity of their students, should be looking towards Silicon Wadi as a beacon of tech and innovation — and should be boycotting groups like Students for Justice in Palestine.

 The writer was a CAMERA on Campus fellow at Duke University in 2020/21. He now works at start-ups in New York City.

The post Here’s How Colleges Should Respond to Destructive BDS Resolutions on Campus first appeared on Algemeiner.com.