The New York Times Just Accidentally Proved This Election Is A Sham

When Americans vote in November they will be voting to keep their most disliked candidate out of office rather than voting to elect a President, such is the deep unpopularity of the two nominees, Clinton and Trump. How did this happen? The New York Times just accidentally proved the illegitimacy of US democratic elections when they published an interesting analysis on Monday showing only 14% of eligible voters actually voted for the two nominees combined. This figure might seem staggeringly low, but The New York Times points out that the turnout in this years primary elections is nearly identical to recent primaries. A very low percentage of citizens choosing who will eventually claim to have won a popular vote is actually nothing new. Today's paper, an unintentional reminder to look at third party candidates like @GovGaryJohnson or @DrJillStein. pic.twitter.com/vC6KnbIq7h — Edward Snowden (@Snowden) August 1, 2016 AntiMedia report: The United States is supposed to be a democratic republic where the entire population is represented by people elected to do their bidding. But how can politicians claim to have a legitimate mandate to create laws that affect the entire population when they are put in place by a fraction of said [...]