Can government that failed to stop war bring peace? - Vahe Hovhannisyan
ArmInfo. The publication of part of the memoirs of former Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif
indicates that Armenia, during military operations with Azerbaijan, rejected several proposals to suspend hostilities on conditions favorable to Yerevan. A member of the "Alternative Projects" group, political scientist Vahe Hovhannisyan wrote about this on his Facebook account.
According to his note, before the publication of the memoirs,
everyone knew that Armenia twice during the 44-day war rejected the
Russian side's proposal to stop the war, but it turns out that during
the fighting, the Armenian authorities several times rejected the
opportunity to stop the war from Tehran, thereby taking on an
indescribable burden for the lives of thousands of people, wounded
and territorial losses.
"This thesis becomes a key point in assessing the actions of any
political force and personality in Armenia. It is necessary to make
it impossible to bypass this issue, just as it is impossible to
calmly continue political and ordinary life, possessing such
information that has no statute of limitations. It should become one
of the key issues national agenda: why were proposals to end the war
rejected?" - noted the political scientist.
He added that the revelations of the former Iranian minister raise
new questions regarding the possibility of influence on the course of
events by another force that did not allow the war to end. "Or maybe
there were other motives? Finally, this question cannot be limited to
the responsibility of one person. There is a circle of people who
must give answers. This circle includes the then-current Minister of
Foreign Affairs, the then President of the Republic of Armenia, who
subsequently fled from Armenia (perhaps for this very reason),
members of the Security Council. In other words, all those who were
aware of the proposals and who did not raise their voices when these
proposals were rejected, who knew what was happening and did not
appeal to the people? to stop the catastrophe? We cannot pretend that
nothing happened, continue to hide in invented lies in a way that
suits us. The secret of a quick end to the war is a red line that
cannot be crossed," Hovhannisyan noted.
He added that the memoirs of the Iranian ex-official should become a
new agenda for Archbishop Bagrat Galstanyan, who is leading the fight
for vital moral principles. "He must certainly make this theme
central. And this will be a real message of politicization of the
process itself. The cost of ending hostilities on fair terms is both
a moral and political issue. It was extremely high. The archbishop's
key message about "internal peace" must also be based on On this
issue, our inner world must demand the discovery of the truth, the
truth about its disastrous recent history. Finally, another very
specific and important question arises: can a government that has not
stopped the war bring peace to the current life of our country? ",
each of us individually has our own monstrous history, and pretending
that it does not exist and continuing to live, inventing a false
reality, will not work," the political scientist stated.