ASEAN, China And The Philippines: A Complex Maritime Dispute – Analysis

I. Introduction 

The South China Sea (SCS) Crisis has been a multifaceted geopolitical issue involving multiple nations within the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and China. The region holds significance not only in terms of strategic maritime routes but also due to its abundant natural resources, such as fish stocks and potential undersea oil and gas reserves.

In July 2024, the crisis witnessed new developments as tensions escalated, necessitating a thorough examination of the positions and strategies of the concerned parties. This essay delves into the dynamics between China, ASEAN, and the Philippines, with a specific focus on the importance of transparency, deterrence, and regional solidarity, while also considering the influence of economic ties and strategic interests on their respective stances. 

II. Overview of the South China Sea Dispute 

The dispute in the SCS revolves around conflicting territorial claims made by China, the Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia, Brunei, and Taiwan. China's claim of the "nine-dash line," which encompasses the majority of the SCS, overlaps with the Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZs) of several ASEAN countries.

In recent years, China has expanded its claim to the "ten-dash line," adding another dash to include Taiwan, thereby extending its assertive claims even further. The region's importance is underscored by its role as a major maritime trade route, facilitating the annual passage of goods valued at approximately $3 trillion, as well as its abundant natural resources. Over the years, the dispute has experienced various incidents, including the construction of artificial islands by China and naval confrontations.

III. ASEAN Response to Chinese Aggressive Behavior 

ASEAN's response to China's aggressive actions in the SCS has been noticeably restrained. No ASEAN member state has openly criticized China's behaviour, primarily due to the intricate interplay of political and economic factors. Countries like Cambodia and Laos, which share significant economic ties with China, often align their positions with Beijing, thereby weakening ASEAN's collective stance.

Indonesia, despite expressing opposition to Chinese incursions into its EEZ around the Natuna Islands, also proceeds cautiously due to its extensive trade and investment relationships with China. This interdependence in the economic realm creates a complex environment for achieving a united ASEAN response. 

IV. The Importance of Transparency, Deterrence, and Regional Solidarity

In the South China Sea crisis, the principles of transparency, deterrence, and regional solidarity play a critical role in the management and mitigation of conflicts. Transparency involves the exchange of information and open communication among ASEAN countries, which helps prevent misunderstandings and fosters trust.

Deterrence necessitates a credible threat of collective action that dissuades aggressive behaviour, highlighting the need for a robust regional security framework. However, achieving regional solidarity poses a challenge due to the divergent interests and economic dependencies among ASEAN members. Despite these challenges, a unified ASEAN is essential to effectively address the South China Sea issue.

V. Position of the Philippines in the South China Sea Crisis 

The Philippines has been at the forefront of the South China Sea dispute, securing a significant legal victory in 2016 when the Permanent Court of Arbitration ruled in its favour against China's expansive claims. Nevertheless, the country has pursued a more diplomatic approach in recent years, emphasizing bilateral negotiations and regional solutions.

The current administration in Manila argues that a counterbalance from external powers, such as the United States, is unnecessary, advocating for a regional resolution that is more sustainable and less provocative. This position underscores the Philippines' commitment to managing the dispute through ASEAN mechanisms and multilateral dialogue. 

VI. Economic Ties and their Impact on the Crisis 

China's economic relationships with several ASEAN countries exert a significant influence on their stance regarding the South China Sea dispute. Countries like Cambodia and Laos heavily depend on Chinese investments and often align themselves with Beijing's position or choose to remain silent on the matter.

Indonesia, while more assertive in defending its maritime rights, navigates a delicate balance between territorial concerns and its economic interests, as it maintains a strong trade relationship with China. These economic dependencies complicate ASEAN's ability to present a united front against China's aggressive actions, as member states must carefully consider the economic consequences of countering Beijing.

VII. Strategies for Deterring China’s Aggressive Behavior 

To effectively deter China's aggressive behaviour in the South China Sea, ASEAN must enhance cooperation with nations that share similar interests in maintaining regional stability and maritime security. Strengthening the ASEAN Coast Guard Forum could serve as a pivotal step in this direction. Improving maritime security cooperation, enhancing information sharing, and conducting joint exercises can help build a more cohesive and capable maritime force within ASEAN.

Additionally, establishing a swift alliance modelled after successful rapid response mechanisms could provide a timely and coordinated response to aggressive actions in the South China Sea. Such strategies require a concerted effort and a willingness to prioritize regional security over individual economic interests.

VIII. Conclusion 

The South China Sea crisis continues to be a pressing matter for ASEAN, China, and the Philippines. The intricate interaction of historical claims, strategic interests, and economic dependencies complicates efforts to find a resolution to the dispute. ASEAN's cautious response to China's assertive behaviour demonstrates the region's economic ties with Beijing and the challenges faced in achieving regional unity. The emphasis placed by the Philippines on regional solutions underscores the potential for ASEAN-led mechanisms to address the crisis, on the condition that there is transparency, deterrence, and a unified position. To effectively manage the South China Sea dispute, ASEAN must strengthen its maritime security and cooperation, and consider the establishment of a regional alliance to discourage further aggressive actions by China.

IX. Recommendations 

1. Enhance Transparency: ASEAN countries should establish more comprehensive mechanisms for sharing information and facilitating communication to foster trust and prevent misunderstandings. 

2. Strengthen Deterrence: Invest in the development of a reliable regional security architecture that can effectively present a unified threat of collective action against any aggressive moves in the South China Sea.

3. Promote Regional Solidarity: ASEAN should prioritize regional interests over individual economic dependencies, and work towards a cohesive stance on the South China Sea Issue.

4. Strengthen the ASEAN Coast Guard Forum: Enhance maritime security cooperation through joint exercises, enhanced information sharing, and capacity building.

5. Form a Rapid Regional Alliance: Establish a swift response mechanism that can effectively and promptly address any aggressive actions in the South China Sea.

The opinions expressed in this article are the author's own.

References

1. Buszynski, Leszek, and Christopher B. Roberts. "The South China Sea Maritime Dispute: Political, Legal and Regional Perspectives." Routledge, 2014.
2. Hayton, Bill. "The South China Sea: The Struggle for Power in Asia." Yale University Press, 2014.
3. Storey, Ian. "ASEAN and the Rise of China: The Search for Regional Order." Routledge, 2011.
4. Tønnesson, Stein. "The South China Sea in the Age of European Decline." Nordic Institute of Asian Studies, 2013.
5. Valencia, Mark J. "The Protracted Conflict in the South China Sea." Adelphi Papers, 1995.