We’re furious after council classed two 70ft trees as a hedge and chopped them down after ONE neighbour complained

A COUNCIL has sparked anger by cutting down two 70ft trees – after a single complaint by a neighbour. Bristol City Council took down the enormous cypress trees despite a sit-in protest and a campaign by local families. The trees were given an Anti-Social Behaviour Order and classified as ‘hedges’ – in a move mocked […]

A COUNCIL has sparked anger by cutting down two 70ft trees – after a single complaint by a neighbour.

Bristol City Council took down the enormous cypress trees despite a sit-in protest and a campaign by local families.

SWNS

The council has classified the trees as ‘hedges’[/caption]

SWNS

Both trees have been chopped down[/caption]

SWNS

The trees are popular with local kids and wildlife including birds and squirrels[/caption]

The trees were given an Anti-Social Behaviour Order and classified as ‘hedges’ – in a move mocked as ‘ridiculous’ by locals residents.

The trees have sat in a quiet cul-de-sac in Horfield in Bristol for 50 years and were popular with kids and wildlife including birds and squirrels.

But Bristol City Council slapped them with a felling notice which has been pinned to one of the trees – classing them as a “nuisance”.

They have now been chopped down.

Locals say there was one complaint about the trees – by someone who said they blocked their light.

Speaking when they trees were served notice, a Bristol City Council spokesperson said: “The action being taken is not a matter of council policy.

“But it is to ensure compliance with national legislation, which designates this type of tree as a hedge.

“We are responding to a complaint about the hedge, in line with the legislation, and have reviewed the options available to us.

“Reducing these trees to the necessary size would leave them unlikely to survive and removing and replanting the tree has been agreed as the best option.

“We have received a number of comments from local residents supporting this approach.

“We’re also investigating and offering further tree-planting spots to bring us closer to our aim of doubling the city’s tree canopy by 2046.”

One resident said: ”It’s bonkers. Everybody is really sad about it.”

“It’s a real shame, because those trees have been there since the early 1970s, at the same time as the estate was built.”

SWNS

The site looks much more vacant now the trees are gone[/caption]

SWNS

All that is left of the 70ft trees is their stumps[/caption]