Artificial intelligence is making its deepest inroads yet into the legal profession. It is turning pilot-scale experimentation into production-level automation. From research and contracting to compliance and billing, AI systems are becoming embedded infrastructure in law firms and in-house operations. Investors are taking notice.
Funding to legal technology startups has already surpassed $2.4 billion in 2025. This is the highest annual total on record, according to Crunchbase. The surge reflects confidence that automation can relieve the sector’s document-heavy workloads. It can also unlock new operating leverage for firms.
From Pilots to Infrastructure
What began as narrow pilots in document review has evolved into enterprise-wide deployment. Andreessen Horowitz called it a once-in-a-generation opportunity to rebuild the legal stack from the ground up. Partner Marc Andrusko wrote that products creating leverage in the law-firm model, enabling each partner to handle more matters, will practically sell themselves. On the other hand, those undermining billable-hour economics will be “swimming upstream.”
Contracting remains the most common entry point because its workflows are repetitive and measurable. Luminance, Spellbook and Robin AI automate clause extraction and redlining. Meanwhile, younger startups Aline and Ivo link contract lifecycle data with procurement and spend management systems. These integrations help corporate legal teams flag risk earlier and reduce approval times.
Thomson Reuters’ CoCounsel Core now embeds generative AI research assistants within Westlaw and Practical Law, producing citation-linked answers with contextual reasoning. Firms are pairing such tools with internal knowledge bases to enhance traceability, a top priority as general counsel imposes stricter governance requirements.
Investors Bet on Legal Automation
The funding momentum reflects both competitive pressure and recognition that legal work lends itself to AI’s pattern recognition strengths.
A major driver this year was Filevine, which disclosed two previously unannounced rounds totaling $400 million. Insight Partners led the first and joined Accel and Halo Experience Co. to co-lead the second. Founded in 2014 in Salt Lake City, the company said the funding will expand its AI-driven tools for document management, billing and case-flow automation. Filevine now counts more than 6,000 clients and 100,000 users. CEO Ryan Anderson told LawSites that the goal is to build a connected fabric between case management and intelligent automation.
Alongside Filevine, San Francisco-based Harvey has become the category’s poster child. The three-year-old startup raised two $300 million rounds in 2025, pushing its total to over $800 million. It now serves eight of the ten highest-grossing U.S. law firms. The company recently crossed $100 million in annual recurring revenue, CNBC reported.
Other major fundraisers include Vancouver-based Clio, one of the earliest cloud legal-practice platforms. Clio is also expanding its AI footprint by integrating drafting and summarization tools into its case management suite. Together, these companies illustrate how AI is moving beyond legal research into operational workflows.
Legal work is among the most expensive and repetitive of professional services. Automation may not immediately reduce client costs. However, it allows lawyers to redirect billable hours from paperwork toward analysis and strategy — a measurable productivity gain that appeals to both partners and clients.
Governance Becomes the Moat
As adoption widens, accountability and data integrity have become decisive differentiators. Legal firm Baker Donelson noted that traceability and auditability have become central to general-counsel risk frameworks. Many firms are replacing open-web integrations with closed-network or internally hosted deployments to ensure that client data remains under firm control.
Litigation automation is advancing more cautiously. The National Law Review observed this year that while AI aids discovery and document review, decisions on relevance and privilege “must remain under attorney supervision,” underscoring that human judgment remains a legal and ethical requirement.
Regulators are also tightening scrutiny. Courts are increasingly asking whether AI systems used in filings or research rely on verifiable, licensed datasets. In a JD Supra commentary, legal-tech advisors warned that vendors often overpromise time savings while downplaying governance overhead. The result, analysts say, is a shift from “faster output” to provable accountability as the industry’s main competitive axis.
Investor Sarah Guo predicted that governance will define the next phase of competition. “The next big differentiator won’t be accuracy; it will be accountability,” she said.
Andrusko added that because confidentiality limits cross-client data sharing, “credibility and audit trails may prove more durable than data volume.”
The Legal Stack’s Next Phase
Legal AI is moving from experimentation to embedded infrastructure, reshaping how services are priced and delivered. For incumbents like Thomson Reuters and newcomers like Spellbook and Robin AI, the race is no longer about producing drafts faster, but ensuring every AI-assisted output can withstand court and client scrutiny. As Andrusko noted, “The legal AI boom is real, but not every idea will stick.” The winners will be those who become indispensable to how the profession actually works.
For all PYMNTS AI coverage, subscribe to the daily AI Newsletter.
