Judge’s Actions and Decision in Kari Lake Case Are Leading America Closer to a One-Party System
The corrupt and cowardly judge in Maricopa County, Arizona, Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Peter Thompson, refused eight counts of election corruption in Arizona in the Kari Lake case and set it up for his quick refusal of the facts.
TGP followed the Kari Lake case from start to finish. It was a train wreck. The judge started things off sideways by only allowing two of Kari Lake’s complaints related to the election to be heard.
Judge Thompson totally ignored the fact that hundreds of thousands of ballots accepted in the election were from envelopes where the signatures were garbage and clearly should never have been accepted. These ballots needed to be cured but they weren’t. But then again, Katie Hobbs, the current corrupt Secretary of State was in the race for governor and she apparently needed these votes to win the election. (The ends justify the means.)
At least two individuals from the county were caught having to change their first-day statements on the second day of the two-day trial. The first individual was Maricopa County Official Scott Jarrett.
The attorney for Maricopa County, the ever-unimpressive Thomas Liddy, son of G. Gordon Liddy, appeared to have changed his comments on the second day of the two-day trial as well.
One of the county’s witnesses was a pompous woke professor from Wisconsin who wasn’t even in Maricopa on election day and he based his comments on that day on what the county told him.
Townhall’s Rachel Alexander made some excellent points in an article there.
Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Peter Thompson only gave her two days for a trial and issued his ruling immediately afterwards, even though he could have taken several days, and it was one of the biggest, most important cases in the country. Legal experts believe his decision was ghostwritten, they suspect top left-wing attorneys like Marc Elias emailed him what to say.
The standard should have been whether voters were disenfranchised, not all the additional hoops Thompson added. If inner city blacks had been disenfranchised, Thompson would not have added all those extra requirements, he would have made the law fit. Robert Gouveia, a rare attorney who isn’t afraid to speak up and who describes himself as watching prosecutors, judges and politicians, said the standard should have been whether there was voter suppression.
Instead, Thompson said Lake had to show an extremely vague, high bar in order to prevail, that an election official intentionally caused the printer changes in order to change the results of the election, and that it did affect the outcome. He explained away many of the disturbing election anomalies as accidents or mere coincidences. He ignored the vast majority of them; in a show of arrogance, his opinion was less than eight pages long.
Thompson completely ignored all the voters who saw the long lines and gave up trying to vote, as if they didn’t count. Considering probably well over half of the voting locations in Maricopa County were affected, not to mention they were almost all in heavily Republican areas, this was no small disenfranchisement. Many voters have come forward and told how they were unable to vote for this reason or similar, such as a man who couldn’t find parking in time due to the overcrowded parking lot.
Even with the higher burden required by Thompson, well-known lawyer Viva Frei, whose real name is David Freheit, said Lake’s team showed there was intentionality and believed the case was a slam dunk.
Alexander went on to mention some of the many times that elections were found fraudulent and required to be done over.
Thompson said in his opinion that it was unprecedented in history to set aside an election like that, but he was mincing words. It’s happened many times. In 2013, in Pembroke, North Carolina, a new election was ordered for town council after it came out that at least two candidates helped bring people to the town’s early voting location who were ineligible to vote. In 2018, in Sharpsburg, North Carolina, a judge merely cited “an irregularity” as enough to order a new election. There, only 20-25 voters were alleged to have been disenfranchised.
TGP shared a similar list in the past of 20 elections between 1992 and 2022 that either declared the rightful owner per the courts or were done over:
Alexander closed with this:
A friend described the situation, “We don’t have a justice system and voting is becoming pointless. Only Democrat votes matter in our country now.” Voter fraud experts believe the Democrats started targeting states years ago, like Washington and California, then moved on to Colorado. Arizona, Georgia and Pennsylvania are their latest targets. They intend to move on to states like Florida next if not stopped. Voter disenfranchisement has become the most important issue facing Republicans today, and if not stopped, we will become a one-party nation.
Kari Lake had a great case. So did so many others including President Trump after the 2020 Election. The Republicans can’t see it or are part of it, like those “Republicans” in Maricopa County. The Democrats will do anything to win, lie, cheat and steal.
Americans know what’s up and see the crooks for who they are. No way we’ll stand for a one-party communist system.
The post Judge’s Actions and Decision in Kari Lake Case Are Leading America Closer to a One-Party System appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.